Sunday, August 3, 2025

OF COURSE: Ghislaine Moved to Minimum-Security Prison After Questioning by former Trump lawyer

 Ghislaine Maxwell Moved to Minimum-Security Prison After Justice Dept. Questioning 

Ghislaine Maxwell exercising on the track inside FCI Tallahassee, where she is currently serving twenty years for for her role in the sex trafficking ring operated by Jeffrey Epstein. (photo: Matt Symons/MEGA)

SURPRISE: Epstein associate and co-sex offender transferred to cushy digs after promising who knows what.
Alan Feuer / The New York Times
 

ALSO SEE: Ghislaine Maxwell Moved to a Lower-Security Prison in Texas


Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein now serving a 20-year prison sentence for sexually exploiting and abusing teenage girls, has been moved from a federal prison in Florida to minimum-security prison camp in Texas, her lawyer said on Friday.

The move, which was reported earlier by The New York Sun, came about a week after Ms. Maxwell was interviewed over two days about the Epstein case by Todd Blanche, the No. 2 official in the Justice Department and one of President Trump’s former lawyers.

Ms. Maxwell’s lawyer, David O. Markus, declined to comment on the reason for the move.

According to Bureau of Prison regulations, inmates designated as sex offenders are generally supposed to be held in low-security prisons, like the facility in Tallahassee, Fla., where Ms. Maxwell had been previously held, not in minimum-security facilities, like her new prison camp in Bryan, Texas.

Mr. Blanche met with Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Markus last Thursday and Friday amid a firestorm of criticism from Trump supporters who have called for the administration to release all federal files related to Mr. Epstein.

Before entering government service, several top aides to Mr. Trump, including the F.B.I. director Kash Patel, had led the president’s followers to believe that there were secrets lurking in the Epstein files about a cabal of powerful men implicated in Mr. Epstein’s sex crimes. Many of those followers were outraged after the Justice Department released an unsigned letter last month saying there would be no further disclosures about the case.

The letter was issued about two months after top officials at the Justice Department informed Mr. Trump that he himself was mentioned in the files, according to several people with knowledge of the exchange. A person’s name appearing in the documents is not necessarily an indication of wrongdoing.

Mr. Markus has said that during Ms. Maxwell’s interview with Mr. Blanche, she answered questions about 100 people. It remains unclear whether those people were victims of Mr. Epstein, his associates or other people implicated in her own sex-trafficking case.

Ms. Maxwell has made it clear that she would like a pardon or for her sentence to be thrown out or reduced. Mr. Trump has not indicated what he intends to do but has told reporters that he is legally allowed to pardon Ms. Maxwell.

Two women who have accused Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell of abusing them, Maria and Annie Farmer, and the family members of another, Virginia Giuffre, who died by suicide this spring, reacted angrily to the news of Ms. Maxwell’s relocation.

“It is with horror and outrage that we object to the preferential treatment convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has received,” they said in a statement on Friday. “Ghislaine Maxwell is a sexual predator who physically assaulted minor children on multiple occasions, and she should never be shown any leniency.”

“President Trump has sent a clear message today: Pedophiles deserve preferential treatment and their victims do not matter,” the statement said.

The Gruesome Foursome: Donnie, Melania, Jeffrey and Ghislaine.
 

Friday, August 1, 2025

Trump and his favorite white supremacist Stephen Miller beg people to join ICE

no image description available
A smug President Donald Trump smirks as White House resident bigot and deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller speaks at Macomb County Community College Sports Expo Center in Warren, Michigan, on April 29.

President Donald Trump and one of his administration’s best-known bigots have turned to social media to recruit people to join up with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The ICE recruitment drive is occurring as the agency faces harsh criticism for its thuggish approach to immigration enforcement, including abducting people and intimidating law-abiding citizens.

“We need MORE courageous men and women to, MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Tuesday night. “Join ICE now. We will take GREAT care of you, just like you take care of us!”

The message was echoed by infamous bigot Stephen Miller, who serves as the White House deputy chief of staff. 

FILE - U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers wait to detain a person, Jan. 27, 2025, in Silver Spring, Md. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers wait to detain a person on Jan. 27 in Silver Spring, Maryland.

“Do you want to deport criminal invaders from the United States? The newly-passed Big Beautiful Bill provides extraordinary incentives for new ICE hires,” Miller wrote on X.

ICE has been under fire for the way it has executed Trump’s mass deportations. The agency has deployed masked agents to harass people around the country, in some instances lying to get access to targets. ICE raids even have students afraid of being swept up while attending classes.

The backlash to Trump’s immigration action has led to a loss of support in what has traditionally been an area of political strength. A YouGov poll released earlier this month found that just 35% of Latinos approved of the job he’s doing as president, while 62% disapproved. That drop came as Trump and his team ramped up deportations, including sending military forces to Los Angeles to carry out protection for ICE raids.

The thuggish behavior from the agency has emboldened racists to dress up and impersonate ICE agents, and criminals are doing the same around the country.

ICE is the most visible way in which the public is being faced with the Trump deportation agenda. And they don’t appear to like what they see—so is it any wonder that Trump and his team now have to troll social media to scrape up new recruits?


Wednesday, July 30, 2025

We Must Not Comply: How Do We Disrupt the Momentum of Trump’s Cruelty?

 We Do Not Comply: How Do We Disrupt the Momentum of Trump’s Cruelty? 

Non-compliance is art, as art is meant to defy the status quo, question the givens, expand the boundaries of knowing and freedom.’ (photo: Olga Fedorov/EPA)

"They’re trying to replace what was with  minority rule by the disgustingly wealthy humans."

V (formerly Eve Ensler) / Guardian UK
(V is a playwright and activist and the founder of V-Day, a global movement to end violence against women and girls.)
 

The exterminating force of Project 2025 is plowing through the culture, the government and people’s hearts and bodies like a drunk on a violent tear. 

We wake each morning, holding our breath to bear witness to the new devastation: PBS and NPR defunded, cuts to the fight against human trafficking, Medicaid gone for millions, Ice working to surveil critics, tons of food for the poor ordered burned and wasted.

The momentum of cruelty always feels inevitable. Cruelty is by definition “a callous indifference to or pleasure in causing pain”. For those of us who have suffered physical, political, racial and emotional abuse, it feels like a familiar steamroller of violence. 

We only have to witness the cries of parents being separated from their children, men screaming out for “libertad” from cages in an Everglades detention center (AKA Alligator Alcatraz), non-violent protesters beaten for trying to stop a genocide, to be frozen in that same incapacitating dread and fear.

What is the antidote to this destructive environment of mendacity possessing us now with fear, ennui and self-mutilating rage?

Ash-lee Woodard Henderson, a powerhouse activist and brilliant organizer, told me: “It’s not decided where we go yet. Which is why it feels tense. What we know is that there’s no going back to an old normal because our economic system has failed us and our governmental structure is being destroyed. 

They’re trying to replace what was with this minority rule of disgustingly wealthy humans dictating what can happen, not only in this country but globally.

“We’ve have to block and build at the same time. That means confronting both elected officials and the corporations that are lifting them up. We need to make sure that we are gumming up their ability to successfully implement any sort of action, whether it’s policy or otherwise, that takes more power and rights and access to life-saving resources away from our communities.”

So how do we gum up their momentum; how do we become refusers, artists of disruption, interrupters of their hateful and life-destroying trajectory? How do we clear the noise and fear in our heads so that we are able to hear the call of our inner morality?

“The thing that I love about being non-cooperative and non-compliant with the Trump administration,” Ash-Lee told me, “is its accessibility: people have all sorts of abilities, all sorts of means, regardless of class, regardless of identity, to find a tactic that fits for them. 

What keeps you up at night enough to make you active? Trump says we shouldn’t ask people for warrants. We demand warrants. When a business puts a ’No Kings’ sign up or a ’No Ice’ sign in their window, they’re not complying. And we need more people to do that wherever they are,” she said, “whether it’s a general saying, ’I’m not gonna command my troops to do this,’ whether it’s troops becoming conscientious objectors, whether it’s us boycotting Target and T-Mobile.”

This tyrannical white supremacist landscape is erasing our sense of existence and meaning. Daily forms of rebellion birth us back into our bodies and our purpose. 

Non-compliance is art, as art is meant to defy the status quo, question the givens, expand the boundaries of knowing and freedom. And as you courageously make your mark of refusal, you carve a path for others to be brave. Non-compliance is praxis, stretching and transforming the muscles of our discontent into impactful and embodied action.

There are a multitude of ways that we can make their lives miserable by taking small risks and huge ones. Like folks in California sitting in their cars outside the hotels where the Ice agents are and just lying on their horn for hours. Or people towing Ice vans away that are parked illegally. Or the Harlem baseball coach who knew all his kids were American-born. When Ice invaded the field, he told his kids to get inside the batting cage and stay silent. He said he was willing to die for his kids to get home.

“And non-complying is also filling in the gaps of resources and care that they are taking away. They’re already closing rural hospitals where we live because our governor didn’t expand Medicaid,” Ash-Lee told me. “So residents must build an alternative like country people and black folks across the country have been doing on their own accord for decades, if not centuries, creating community spaces where we can both line dance, do some boots-on-the-ground organizing, get your blood pressure checked, get your mammogram in the mobile unit, get your teeth cleaned, whatever. All of those things are not complying.”

I think of the man who suggested we all dress in Ice suits with masks and Oakley sunglasses and enter detention centers and free immigrants. Or my white British friend who was in a store in Nevada when Ice invaded and they started harassing Latinos for their identification. He stepped up and calmly asked why they weren’t asking for his ID. He asked simply without hostility. He asked it three times. 

Even though they continued, he momentarily disrupted the trajectory of cruelty and forced them to bring consciousness to what they were doing. Or the Rev Mariann Budde’s staring down Trump and his billionaire cronies in the first row of a Washington church in January, calmly and fearlessly demanding compassion for immigrants, refugees and LGBTQ+ communities.

And this is the time for artists to speak out, to disembed themselves from a fascist system, to place principles over profit and self-advancement. To be what Viet Thanh Nguyen calls “disagreeable”. Yes, of course there are risks. But at this moment, with the jackboots in the streets and at our door, when each hour another liberty is being erased, and those who speak truth to power are being removed from TV, from universities, from cultural centers, when the cultural platforms are being removed themselves, speaking out is not just an obligation, it’s survival.

And there are artists beginning to organize. The poet Michael Klein is creating a new podcast calling writers “to take our language back in writing a way through the various veils of deceit–an act, which in itself, has always been a form of resistance”. Meena Jagannath, a movement lawyer, is gathering artists and activists in salons to deepen our collective investigation and imaginative co-creation. She told me: “Our charge in these times is to support each other in building protagonism – a sense that we have agency to contest fascist narratives about how the world is and should be. It needs to be a collective, creative and responsive process that takes in what’s going out there and alchemizes it into a more expansive imagination of what could and should be.”

So in a nod to the late great Mary Oliver, I ask you, what is the one precious, wild creative act you are doing to impede this nightmare?







Monday, July 28, 2025

Two Takes on South Park Episode Skewering Trump

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

A still from South Park. (photo: Comedy Central/Everett Collection) 
TAKE 1: The White House says the show is “fourth-rate” after it showed Trump with “tiny” genitals. 

Manisha Krishnan / WIRED

July 27, 2025   


In an interview with Vanity Fair in September, South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone all but swore off satirizing Donald Trump, with Parker noting, “I don’t know what more we could possibly say.”

We found out what more they could say on Friday, in brutal fashion. The same day Paramount announced a five-year streaming deal with South Park, including 50 new episodes, the show’s 27th season premiere mercilessly mocked both President Trump and the network for capitulating to his demands, settling with him over the 60 Minutes lawsuit, and canceling The Late Show With Stephen Colbert

The episode, called “Sermon on the ’Mount,” did not hold back on crass jokes aimed at Trump, showing him with a “teeny tiny” penis both in animation and as a deepfake and portraying him as Satan’s lover in a style reminiscent of the gay Saddam Hussein character from the 1999 movie South Park: Bigger, Longer … Uncut.

The episode aired as Paramount is set to merge with media company Skydance. Politicians and media personalities alike are speculating that the company’s eagerness to keep Trump happy is motivated by gaining the US Federal Communications Commission’s approval of the deal, which was made official Thursday evening. 

Before being fired, Colbert, a late-night ratings leader, described Paramount’s $16-million settlement with Trump as a “big fat bribe” and on Monday’s show he said “the gloves are off” while telling the president “go fuck yourself.” Between Colbert’s remaining season, network colleague Jon Stewart’s scathing indictment of both Paramount and CBS, the new South Park deal, and a transformative merger, the company appears to be looking at a period where some of its biggest stars are openly hostile to both it and the president.

“I welcome Skydance’s commitment to make significant changes at the once storied CBS broadcast network,” FCC chairman Brendan Carr—who wrote Project 2025’s chapter on the telecommunications agency—reportedly said in a statement Thursday supporting the merger. “Today’s decision also marks another step forward in the FCC’s efforts to eliminate invidious forms of DEI.”

Paramount did not respond to WIRED’s requests for comment. In a statement emailed to WIRED, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers derided South Park as irrelevant and derided “left” fans who liked the season opener.

“The Left’s hypocrisy truly has no end—for years they have come after South Park for what they labeled as ’offense’ [sic] content, but suddenly they are praising the show. Just like the creators of South Park, the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows,” she wrote.

“This show hasn’t been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention. President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country’s history—and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump’s hot streak.”

Paramount’s press release announcing the South Park deal—reported to be worth $1.5 billion—describes the show as “one of the most valuable TV franchises in the world.” It also praises Parker and Stone as “fearless” and “boundary-pushing.”

But the roasting of Trump in “Sermon on the ’Mount” was also something else: mean. Deeply, devastatingly mean.

After being accused by the Canadian prime minister of being akin to a “dictator from the Middle East,” Trump lashes out at a White House artist for painting him with a small penis. 

The small dick theme is repeated throughout the episode, with numerous portraits of him humping things and animals and Satan telling him, “I can’t even see anything, it’s so small.” 

Trump petulantly threatens to sue him, and the artist, and Jesus, and the entire town—basically anyone who pisses him off. It’s also implied that he’s on the Epstein list.

“Do you really want to end up like Colbert?” Jesus asks the townspeople, who are pushing back against forced Christianity in their kids’ school. He calls out Paramount by name, saying, “We’re going to get canceled, you idiots.”

The town strikes a deal with the president, forcing them to do pro-Trump messaging—a nod to Trump’s claim on Truth Social that Paramount’s “new owners” have agreed to give him $20 million in advertising and public service announcements in addition to the settlement. (Paramount told Deadline the settlement doesn’t include PSAs and said it “has no knowledge of any promises or commitments made to President Trump other than those set forth in the settlement proposed by the mediator and accepted by the parties.”) 

The show is then interrupted by a PSA, where a deepfake Trump stumbles around naked through the desert; this time, his genitals have a pair of googly eyes attached. “Trump: His penis is teeny-tiny, but his love for us is large,” a narrator says. The ad ends with text on a black backround: “He Gets Us. All Of Us.” “He Gets Us” is also the slogan used for an actual Christian ad campaign.

You can argue that portraying Trump as a narcissistic man-child and focusing so heavily on his appearance is lowbrow. But Nick Marx, an associate professor of film and media studies at Colorado State University, says it’s also a refreshing change from the defiant messaging of Colbert and others.

“It’s fucking funny as hell that they seek to sexually humiliate Trump,” he claims, saying it’s an effective troll of what he believes to be the president’s “vanity and insecurity.”

“I think that is the card to play … and I am frustrated that more of the comedians that I love on the left haven't leaned into that really harsh attack of him.”

Critics of the episode on X issued complaints that “the left took over south park” and “this show is for libtards” while others outright expressed fear that Trump will get the show canceled, saying, “South Park was good while it lasted.”

But making small-dick jokes isn’t woke—it’s exactly that type of humor, along with an affinity for saying the r-word and racial and homophobic slurs that helped cultivate South Park’s right-wing audience. Marx thinks that’s a good thing for liberals.

“Right-wing humorists, the Joe Rogans and Andrew Schulzes of the world, they're the ones occupying this offensive free-speech space. And so anything that the left can do to reclaim artists like Parker and Stone would be a benefit to them.”

In a meeting Thursday, the FCC’s Carr said he’s “not a ’South Park’ watcher,” NBC News reports. He also said Trump is against “a handful of national programmers” who “control and dictate to the American what the narrative is, what they can say, what they can think.” 

But, while many of his attacks have focused on news organizations themselves—ABC, CBS, NPR, even The Wall Street Journal—censoring cherished entertainers could rile up members of the public who frankly may not care that much about the plight of journalists.

That’s something that Paramount, too, has to contend with now.

“They just inked this $1.5 billion deal that, to me, is a gesture of full and unequivocal support from Paramount,” Marx says. “The syndication and streaming licenses that South Park draws are worth much, much more than they've been paying Parker and Stone over the years.” He says he wouldn’t be surprised if Parker and Stone got away with nothing more than a slap on the wrist.

But, as the episode itself indicated, Trump has been relentless with his lawsuit targets and openly bragged about getting Colbert fired and keeping the media in line.

Michael Sozan, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, says he could absolutely see Paramount trying to tone down South Park’s content, considering that the company settled on “the flimsiest of lawsuits,” predicated on the claim that 60 Minutes edited an interview with Kamala Harris to make it more flattering to her. But he said doing so could “wake up a sleeping giant”: the public. The streamer has also promised Trump it will cancel its DEI initiatives.

“A lot of American people are starting to be more and more aware of how Trump is trying to censor reporters, but now also just entertainment shows that he disagrees with. That is something that authoritarians do,” he says. People could respond with outrage or boycotts.

But he cautions that’s not Paramount’s only problem as it clinches the $8 billion Skydance merger.

Already, senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have written a letter to Skydance CEO David Ellison seeking answers about the “secret side deal with President Trump” that allegedly offered him future PSAs. Trump has called Ellison’s father, Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison, a “friend.” California officials are also looking into whether the company engaged in bribery related to the deal, as Semafor reported.

“If there's a Democratic administration and a Democratic Department of Justice starting three years from now, or Democratic House or Senate, Paramount also has opened itself up to the possibility of lots of investigations,” Sozan says.

It’s fascinating that South Park and late-night comics are issuing some of the harshest rebukes of Trump, though Sozan says satire—and joy—are considered by scholars to be an effective tool against authoritarians who “want to keep people depressed and in line.”

He thinks the backlash over Paramount’s mounting controversies could be a genuine “cultural flash point.”

So far, there’s no indication that Paramount plans to censor South Park. Then again, the Skydance merger has only just been greenlit.

At the end of the premiere episode, Cartman and Butters, seemingly stand-ins for Parker and Stone, try to kill themselves because Cartman is depressed that “woke is dead” and he has nothing to make fun of anymore.

“I think I might be going,” Butters says. “Yep, sweet death is about to come. I love you man,” Cartman replies.

For fans of the show—and free speech in general—let’s hope that’s not true. But just in case, you should probably watch that episode now.

 

 Take 2: Trump White House Rages Over ‘South Park’ Episode


Trump White House Rages Over ‘South Park’ Episode, Calls Show ‘Fourth-Rate’  
Satan (left) and Donald Trump (right) appear in 'South Park.' (photo: Comedy Central)
Andrew Perez and Asawin Suebsaeng / Rolling Stone
 
 

Donald Trump’s White House is melting down over Wednesday night’s South Park premiere, which just so happened to attack the president’s “teeny tiny” manhood and depict him as literally in bed with the devil, effectively taking over the role held on the show for years by the late genocidal dictator Saddam Hussein.

“The Left’s hypocrisy truly has no end — for years they have come after South Park for what they labeled as ’offense’ [sic] content, but suddenly they are praising the show,” Trump White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told Rolling Stone in a statement this morning. “Just like the creators of South Park, the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows. This show hasn’t been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention. President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country’s history — and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump’s hot streak.”

The episode came just hours after it was reported that Paramount had agreed to buy the global streaming rights for South Park in a five-year deal worth $1.5 billion.

The twice-impeached, repeatedly indicted president has for decades harbored intense, mean-spirited pop-culture fixations, and that personality trait has not changed six months into his second administration. It would be easier to shrug off his celebrity obsessions as mere cattiness, if waging war on late-night television and its corporate owners weren’t an actual facet of his administration’s sprawling project of authoritarianism and fear.

Prior to the White House’s statement, Rolling Stone had asked several Trump advisers if clips of the latest South Park episode had been circulating among Trump’s staff. One senior administration official replied, “Of course,” noting how much their phone had lit up about it. A Trump adviser also said they’d seen it, and that as a longtime fan of the series, they found it “disappointing.”

Trump recently secured a hefty payout from Paramount to settle his meritless lawsuit against CBS News’ 60 Minutes, based on his claims that the show selectively edited an interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris, his 2024 opponent, to “make her look better.” The agreement is part of a broader pattern of major corporations settling Trump’s baseless lawsuits, agreeing to shovel millions of dollars into his presidential library fund to accommodate the president.

The Paramount settlement comes as the outfit seeks regulatory approval for its merger with Skydance — and appears to contain more than just a payout to Trump’s library fund. According to Trump, the deal includes a $16 million settlement as well as $20 million “from the new Owners, in Advertising, PSAs, or similar Programming.”

South Park specifically skewered the reported PSA arrangement on Wednesday. The episode concluded with an AI-generated PSA showing a fully nude Trump wandering the desert with a “teeny tiny” penis.

Paramount has faced mounting criticism over its efforts to cozy up to Trump. The executive producer of 60 Minutes quit in April, saying he was no longer allowed “to make independent decisions” running the show. The company’s move to part ways with host Stephen Colbert and permanently end The Late Show has created an uproar, too.

Earlier this week, Colbert responded to a Truth Social post from Trump in which the president said he hoped he was the reason Colbert had been fired.

“Go fuck yourself,” Colbert said.

 

Saturday, July 26, 2025

Trump Is Teeing Up a Pardon of Epstein Accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell

 
Think he wouldn’t do it? Really? Did you also think he wouldn’t pardon the January 6 insurrectionists?
 
 
Michael Tomasky / The New Republic
 

So Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime abettor of dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, is meeting Friday for a second time with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. OK, first of all, let’s just stop right there. Why Blanche? Well, gosh, you say, he’s a deputy A.G.; seems legit. 

Actually, no, not by a long shot. Blanche was Trump’s personal defense attorney—on a sex case. (Technically, it was a hush-money case—the one involving adult film actress Stormy Daniels, which Blanche and Trump lost—but it was really about sex, in this case between consenting adults.)

So, no—Blanche, whose actual job entails the day-to-day running of the department, is absolutely not the appropriate person for this task. Wait—let’s stop right there again. 

Is this “task” even legitimate? Under certain circumstances, it might be. Let’s say a mobster is in the can for some felony. Prosecutors believe he has information about a different crime. So they go to him to see if he’ll talk, and they offer him a deal.

If that’s what’s going on here, maybe it’s OK—although alas, we stop again to ponder the morality of offering a deal to a child sex trafficker (hey, right wing, I thought this was a moral line in the sand for you?). 

This is not a mobster rat whose information could bring down another made man or even a whole family. This is a woman who was convicted of conspiring to groom minors for Epstein’s pleasure and who, according to at least one witness at her trial, participated in the sex.

So the whole thing shouldn’t even be happening. She was tried, she was convicted, and that’s that. 

But: If it had to happen; if we are to concede that questioning her at this point is a legitimate enterprise, shouldn’t it be done by a line attorney who is familiar with the details of the case? Of course it should. Someone like, oh, Maurene Comey. Oh. Wait. They fired her last week.

I hope you’re putting these puzzle pieces together with me as we go. The bottom line here is obvious. Donald Trump, I believe, wants to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell in exchange for her silence. Note I said wants to. He might not. A pardon would rip his base in two. He may grasp that and not do it.

But I say there can be little question that he’s thinking about it. In fact, on the White House lawn Friday morning, a couple hours after I wrote this column, he was asked about a possible Maxwell pardon, and he said: “I’m allowed to do it.”

I’m not the only one who smelled this possibility coming. Dave Aronberg, who worked as the Florida drug czar under U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi when she was the state attorney general, made some interesting comments on CNN the other day.

First, he observed how weird it was that Blanche was conducting these interviews: “I can’t overstate it, Brianna [Keilar]. It’s as if the number two executive at CNN was conducting this interview with me instead of you. Like, what? It never happens.”

Then he connected the political dots: “But there are others who could do this, which makes me believe this is a lot about perhaps some politics involved, like maybe to protect the president, to get a deal with Ghislaine Maxwell that she would get some immunity now and maybe a hidden pardon in the future, some sort of implication that she would be pardoned in the future if she comes out and says that the president was exonerated, not involved in any criminal activity.”

Of course, we do not know whether Trump committed these heinous crimes. Like any American, he is entitled to the presumption of innocence. But the mere fact of these interviews being conducted the way they are raises certain obvious suspicions.

Maxwell and her lawyers surely know all this. She has a lot of incentive, in other words, to say what Trump and Blanche want her to say. Oh, and by the way, let’s stop here again. 

Why should we believe a word she says? There is much-documented evidence of Maxwell showing a “significant pattern of dishonest conduct,” as Merrick Garland’s Justice Department put it in 2022. They spared her (and themselves, and their finite resources) a perjury trial because she’d already been convicted of the big stuff.

Even assuming Trump is personally innocent, he still has a motive to cut a deal with Maxwell that leads to an eventual pardon. She might name prominent Democrats or other people to whom Trump is hostile. Her “pattern” suggests she’ll say anything Trump wants her to say.

If you think Trump wouldn’t do this, that pardoning a child sex trafficker is a bridge too far even for Trump … honestly, wake up. I bet you also thought he’d never pardon 1,200 anti-American insurrectionists.

If Trump is innocent, there’s one simple thing he should do. Order the release of all the Epstein files. Ah, but now we know that his name appears in them “multiple” times and that he lied earlier this month when asked about it. (The Wall Street Journal reported this week that Bondi told him about the multiple mentions of his name back in May.)

would MAGA world receive a possible pardon by their hero of a woman who did the things Maxwell did? Some percentage, maybe even a substantial percentage, would throw in the towel, finally. But I doubt a majority. 
 
They’ll find an excuse. Child rape is bad, sure, but it’s really only bad when Democrats do it. Trump was sent by Jesus, after all, and Jesus teaches us to forgive, so Trump’s joined-at-the-hip, 15-year friendship with Epstein was about as Jesus-like as you can get, right? The sad thing about that joke is that, if it’s ever revealed that Trump did unspeakable things, one of those sick “Christian” preachers will probably say this in all seriousness.

The administration’s handling of the Epstein scandal and the likely coming indictment of Barack Obama, which I’ll write about next Monday, take us to depths we never, ever imagined we could reach in this country. 

Trump is the law, the law is Trump. I’ve always thought that, as horrible as everything is, if there’s an election in 2028 and the Democrat wins, we can get back to normal fairly quickly. 

As of this week, I’m not so sure.


Tuesday, July 22, 2025

Trump's rambling response to Epstein question that of a "deeply guilty man"

 

·

Donald Trump gets asked to his face if Attorney General Pam Bondi found his name in the Jeffrey Epstein files — while Karoline Leavitt stands visibly uncomfortable right beside him.

This is the response of a deeply guilty man...

"On Epstein, the attorney general briefed you in the DOJ and FBI's review, the findings of that review, the attorney general briefed you on that—" began a reporter.

"On what? On the uh?" asked Trump, who seems to be having trouble hearing recently.

"On the DOJ and FBI—" said the reporter.

"On what? On what subject?" Trump interjected again.

"Epstein. On Epstein. Of the review of the files, Attorney General Pam Bondi—" replied the reporter.

"A very quick briefing," claimed Trump.

"What did she tell you about the review and specifically did she tell you at all that your name appears in the files?" asked the reporter.

"No, no she's uh, she's given us just a very quick briefing," said Trump. "And in terms of the credibility of the different things that they've seen... And I would say that, you know, these files were made up by Comey. They were made up by Obama. They were made up by the Biden..."

Trump first trotted out this absurd new lie that Barack Obama wrote the Epstein files over the weekend amidst growing MAGA backlash over his refusal to release more information on the billionaire pedophile's case. Unfortunately for him, much of his base is rejecting the idea outright.

"Uh, you know, and we went through years of that with the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax with all of the different things that we had to go through," Trump went on. "We've gone through years of it. But she's handled it very well and it's going to be up to her. Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release yeah."

The last bit is noteworthy. Trump is setting Bondi up to take be his scapegoat. His supporters are already clambering for him to fire her because they are pathologically incapable of accepting the obvious reality that Bondi does whatever Trump directs her to do. They want to believe that Trump is insulated from this wrongdoing. In reality, Bondi was chosen for the job because of her long history of corruption and because Trump knew that she'd follow orders.

The simple truth is that if we don't get these Epstein files, it's because Trump doesn't want us to have them. Given that Elon Musk has alleged that Trump himself is implicated in this case, this stonewalling from the administration is all too predictable.

Don't you love them MAGA beards: a real turn-on.
 

Monday, July 21, 2025

COLBERT AXED: Billionaire Class Buying Up All the Media So We Can’t Laugh at Them Anymore

 The Late Show host Stephen Colbert. (photo: CBS)

Trump world is run by thin-skinned losers who have swapped patronage for censorship

Opheli Garcia Lawler / Cracked
 

Yesterday, it was announced that Late Night with Stephen Colbert would be coming to an end in 2026. Not only would the host be out of a job, but the decades-long Late Night would be ending in its entirety. This isn’t entirely a surprise; for weeks, rumors have been circulating that the merger between Skydance and Paramount would result in both Colbert and Jon Stewart getting axed from the corporation.

Skydance owners, Larry and David Ellison, were reportedly already planning to cozy up to Donald Trump, by giving him free political ads on their network worth up to $20 million. So, when Trump called for the firing of Colbert, there was plenty of speculation that the Ellisons would capitulate there as well. And look, they did.  While Jon Stewart still has his job, Colbert and his staff of 200 people will be out of one by next year.

It’s pathetic and scary. Paramount and the Ellisons have bowed so low to Trump that they have a perfect view of our president’s ridiculously swollen ankles. The President of the United States is now silencing his TV critics, unable to stomach the fact that even while he doles out unfathomable cruelty to us we’re still laughing at him. 

I’ll never be the first one to say that anything Colbert was doing was the smartest, bravest or even most entertaining comedy. But he made my mother laugh.

What’s really terrifying is that there wasn’t a great attempt by Paramount and CBS to give a convincing alternative reason for pulling Colbert from the air. Late Night is consistently the highest rated, most viewed show in its slot. If you can’t convert 2.4 million nightly viewers into something profitable, you’re bad at your job. This was about censorship and punishment.

There will be hemming and hawing about the motives, despite the obvious reality of the situation. Why? Because billionaires are always getting the benefit of the doubt. They go around the world stealing, committing environmental crimes and making the internet worse, and yet, there’s a large segment of the population that oohs and ahhs at their entrepreneurship.

Billionaires aren’t sociopaths surrounded by sycophants; they’re leaders, businessmen. We live in a world where poor people get prosecuted for stealing meat and diapers from Walmart while Walmart CEO Don McMillon carries on the company’s decades’ long practice of egregious wage theft to applause. 

It’s not just that rich people are habitually pilfering our shit, either. They aren’t patrons of anything anymore, either. We’ve left the era of benevolent philanthropy and are now fully ensconced in the era of thin-skinned malevolent avarice.

Not only are these greedy bastards not patrons of art, theater or science (bombs and vanity space field trips don’t count), the billionaire class is sabotaging the forms of free-expression that existed despite them. The sometimes-brilliant, often-mean, undeniably-essential website Gawker? Pummeled out of existence by B-plot supervillain Peter Thiel. The endlessly-useful, sometimes-revolutionary platform formerly known as Twitter? Elon Musk bought it because everyone was (rightfully) making fun of him. Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post, which is in a state of constant turmoil because of his nonstop editorial interference.

None of these men — Trump, Bezos, Musk, Thiel, the Ellisons — can stomach being the punchline. So they’re stealing our laughter too.

The Billionaire Class Has Bought Up All of Media So We Can’t Laugh at Them Anymore 

Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison and his son David Ellison, who own Skydance have been reportedly planning to provide Trump with free political ads. Aren't you glad these thugs don't live next door? (photo: Getty)

  

OF COURSE: Ghislaine Moved to Minimum-Security Prison After Questioning by former Trump lawyer

    Ghislaine Maxwell exercising on the track inside FCI Tallahassee, where she is currently serving twenty years for for her role in the ...